Commercial clients, letting agents and principal contractors ask for a site-specific risk assessment before they let you start. This is the form, with the 5×5 scoring an assessor expects and a prompt list of the hazards a cleaning assessment is normally expected to have considered.
Free, no signup, no email Prints to A4 Written for UK cleaning businesses
PDF
No signup. Nothing on this page is behind a form.
Vulnerable people on site: children, patients, residents
Asbestos in buildings constructed before 2000
Weather and external conditions for outdoor tasks
Access and egress: stairs, lifts, out-of-hours entry
Equipment failure and unguarded machinery
Control measures to record
For each hazard you keep, record what is already in place before you score the residual risk.
Wet floor signage deployed and removed after drying
Colour-coded equipment used correctly by area
Training records current for every task and machine
PPE specified, issued, fitted and replaced when damaged
Chemicals stored locked, labelled and never decanted unlabelled
Safety data sheets available on site
Equipment inspected before use; PAT testing in date
Lone worker check-in procedure with a named contact and escalation
Spill and sharps procedure with the kit actually on site
Accident and near-miss reporting route explained and used
Emergency procedure and assembly point known by every cleaner
Supervision arrangements and audit frequency defined
Scoring: likelihood × severity
Score the risk that remains once your existing controls are in place,
not the risk before them.
Five by five risk matrix: likelihood multiplied by severity
Likelihood ↓ / Severity →
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
2
2
4
6
8
10
3
3
6
9
12
15
4
4
8
12
16
20
5
5
10
15
20
25
1–4 Low: acceptable, monitor 5–9 Medium: reduce where practicable 10–16 High: further controls needed 20–25 Unacceptable: do not proceed
Assessment
Score the residual risk: the risk that remains once the existing controls are in place. L = likelihood (1–5), S = severity (1–5), R = L × S.
Hazard
Who might be harmed
Existing controls
L
S
R
Further action needed
By whom / when
Slip on wet floor after mopping
Cleaners, staff, visitors
Wet floor signs; mop in sections; clean out of hours where possible
2
3
6
Signs to remain until dry, not until the cleaner leaves
Supervisor, each visit
Free to print, copy and use commercially, including with your own
clients and staff. From CleanFlo, cleaning business
software for UK companies.
In CleanFlo
The same 5×5, held against the site
CleanFlo scores risk assessments on this exact matrix, keeps them against the site they belong to, tracks the review date, and prints to A4 when a client asks. Incidents and audits sit beside them, feeding a live compliance score.
What a 5×5 risk matrix is, and why clients ask for one
A 5×5 matrix scores each hazard twice: how likely harm is on a scale of one to five, and how severe it would be on the same scale. Multiplying the two gives a risk rating from 1 to 25, which bands into low, medium, high and unacceptable.
The point is not the arithmetic, it is that it forces a consistent judgement and makes priorities visible. A hazard scoring 20 gets dealt with before one scoring 4, and an assessor reading your document can see at a glance whether you have thought about it or written "low risk" against everything.
Clients ask for scored assessments because unscored ones cannot be compared or audited. A facilities manager reviewing three contractors' documents is looking for whether the significant risks were identified and rated honestly, and an assessment with no high scores anywhere reads as one nobody took seriously.
Score
Band
What it means in practice
1–4
Low
Acceptable. Monitor, no further action required.
5–9
Medium
Reduce where reasonably practicable. Record what you did.
10–16
High
Additional controls required before work proceeds.
20–25
Unacceptable
Do not proceed. The work must be redesigned or stopped.
Stop printing it
The same document, live on your cleaners' phones, ticked off as they
work and filed against the job. £19.99 a month,
unlimited staff, clients and locations.
Send us what you have and we will import it for you, free, during the trial. Ask us to import it
Residual risk is the number that matters
The most common mistake on a cleaning risk assessment is scoring the hazard as if no controls existed. Mopping a floor with no signage, no training and no procedure genuinely is high risk; that is not the question the form is asking.
Score the residual risk: what remains once the controls you have listed are actually in place. That is what tells a reader whether your existing measures are enough, and it is why the "existing controls" column comes before the scores rather than after.
If the residual score is still high, the honest response is further action, not a lower number. An assessment that scores everything as low is the one an auditor stops trusting.
The hazards cleaning assessments routinely miss
Slips, manual handling and chemicals are on every cleaning risk assessment. These are the ones that get left off and then come up at audit.
Lone working. Cleaning is overwhelmingly done alone, often out of hours in an empty building. If there is no check-in procedure with a named contact and an escalation if they do not call, that is a gap.
Sharps in waste. Including in ordinary office washrooms. A procedure and a sharps kit, or an instruction never to compress a bin by hand.
Asbestos. In any building constructed before 2000, the duty holder should hold an asbestos register and you are entitled to see it before disturbing anything.
Violence and aggression. Relevant in retail, healthcare, education and any public-facing site.
Vibration. Prolonged use of rotary machines and scrubber-driers is a real exposure over years, not a technicality.
Vulnerable people on site. Cleaning in schools, care homes and hospitals changes both the risk and the controls.
Risk assessment, method statement, RAMS
The three terms get used interchangeably and are not the same thing. A risk assessment identifies hazards and rates them. A method statement describes, step by step, how the work will be carried out safely. RAMS is simply the two submitted together, which is what a principal contractor normally means when they ask.
A COSHH assessment is a third, separate document covering hazardous substances specifically. Your risk assessment should reference it rather than duplicate it.
For most commercial tenders you will need all three, site-specific, plus insurance certificates and training records. Being able to produce them the same day is a genuine commercial advantage over competitors who cannot.
Frequently asked questions
01Do cleaning companies legally need a risk assessment?
Yes. Every employer in Great Britain must assess the risks to employees and to anyone else affected by the work, under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations. Employers with five or more employees must record the significant findings. Self-employed cleaners whose work can affect others are covered too.
02What should a cleaning risk assessment include?
The site and activity assessed, the hazards identified, who might be harmed and how, the control measures already in place, a rating of the residual risk, any further action needed with an owner and a date, and the name of the assessor with the assessment and review dates. Scoring on a 5×5 matrix is the format most commercial clients expect.
03Can I use a generic cleaning risk assessment?
A generic template is a starting point, not a finished assessment. HSE requires assessments to be specific to the work and the premises, and principal contractors routinely reject generic documents. Use this template as the structure and the prompt list, then walk the site and write down what is actually there.
04How often should a cleaning risk assessment be reviewed?
At the review date you set, which is commonly annually, and additionally whenever the work changes, the site changes, new equipment or chemicals are introduced, or after any accident or near miss. An assessment with a review date in the past is one of the first things an auditor notices.
05What is the difference between a risk assessment and a method statement?
A risk assessment identifies the hazards and rates the risk. A method statement sets out the sequence of work and how each step will be done safely. Submitted together they are usually called RAMS, which is what most commercial clients and principal contractors are asking for.
More free templates
Every one of them complete, printable and free to use with your own
clients and staff.